| Title |
Patient-reported preferences for oral versus intravenous administration for the treatment of cancer: a review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s106629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Eek, Meaghan Krohe, Iyar Mazar, Alison Horsfield, Farrah Pompilus, Rachel Friebe, Alan L Shields |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 40 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 82 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#692,387
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#29
of 1,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,741
of 387,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#5
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.