The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Nanoformulated Bioactive Compounds Derived from Different Natural Products Combat Pancreatic Cancer Cell Proliferation
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s238256 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deena S Mousa, Ali H El-Far, Amna A Saddiq, Thangirala Sudha, Shaker A Mousa |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 26% |
Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,517,220
of 26,058,621 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#210
of 4,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,498
of 386,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#4
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,058,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.