↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of observational studies evaluating costs of adverse drug reactions
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s115689
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francisco Batel Marques, Ana Penedones, Diogo Mendes, Carlos Alves

Abstract

The growing evidence of the increased frequency and severity of adverse drug events (ADEs), besides the negative impact on patient's health status, indicates that costs due to ADEs may be steadily rising. Observational studies are an important tool in pharmacovigilance. Despite these studies being more susceptible to bias than experimental designs, they are more competent in assessing ADEs and their associated costs. To identify and characterize the best available evidence on ADE-associated costs. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from 1995 to 2015. Observational studies were included. The methodological quality of selected studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration tool for experimental and observational studies. Studies were classified according to the setting analyzed in "ambulatory", "hospital", or both. Costs were classified as "direct" and "indirect". Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The total incremental cost per patient with ADE was estimated. Twenty-nine (94%) longitudinal observational studies and two (7%) cross-sectional studies were included. Twenty-three (74%) studies were assessed with the highest methodological quality score. The studies were mainly conducted in the US (61%). Twenty (65%) studies evaluated any therapeutic group. Twenty (65%) studies estimated costs of ADEs leading to or prolonging hospitalization. The "direct costs" were evaluated in all studies, whereas only two (7%) also estimated the "indirect costs". The "direct costs" in ambulatory ranged from €702.21 to €40,273.08, and the in hospital from €943.40 to €7,192.36. Methodological heterogeneities were identified among the included studies, such as design, type of ADEs, suspected drugs, and type and structure of costs. Despite such discrepancies, the financial burden associated with ADE costs was found to be high. In the light of the present findings, validated methods to measure ADE-associated costs need future research efforts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 19 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 22 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 24 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,791,459
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#164
of 514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,360
of 381,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 514 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.