| Title |
Atypical Pathogen Distribution in Chinese Hospitalized AECOPD Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s300779 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chenye Feng, Mingtao Xu, Jian Kang, Fuqiang Wen, Yahong Chen, Jing Zhang, Wei Xiao, Zhonghe Zhang, Lan Yang, Jianmin Huo, Jie Cao, Li Zhao, Shuyue Xia, Yan Yin, Wei Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,839,541
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#562
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,775
of 459,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#18
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.