Title |
A living thick nanofibrous implant bifunctionalized with active growth factor and stem cells for bone regeneration
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s72670 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sandy Eap, Laetitia Keller, Jessica Schiavi, Olivier Huck, Leandro Jacomine, Florence Fioretti, Christian Gauthier, Victor Sebastian, Pascale Schwinté, Nadia Benkirane-Jessel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Materials Science | 12 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 18% |
Engineering | 7 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Chemical Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 19 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,339,368
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#498
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,982
of 361,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#15
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.