| Title |
N-Acetylcysteine as Adjuvant Therapy for COVID-19 – A Perspective on the Current State of the Evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jir.s306849 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kon Ken Wong, Shaun Wen Huey Lee, Kok Pim Kua |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 28% |
| Japan | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 108 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2023.
All research outputs
#680,874
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#18
of 985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,708
of 456,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#1
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.