| Title |
Prospective Trial of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using 3D-Printed Triangular Titanium Implants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.2147/mder.s253741 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vikas Patel, Don Kovalsky, S Craig Meyer, Abhineet Chowdhary, Harry Lockstadt, Fernando Techy, Casey Langel, Robert Limoni, Philip S Yuan, Andy Kranenburg, Daniel Cher, Gabriel Tender, Travis J Hillen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,039,098
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#16
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,304
of 433,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them