↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Investigation on Internet addiction disorder in adolescents in Anhui, People’s Republic of China

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Investigation on Internet addiction disorder in adolescents in Anhui, People’s Republic of China
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s110156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Chen, Yaowen Kang, Weizhi Gong, Lianping He, Yuelong Jin, Xiaoyue Zhu, Yingshui Yao

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and prevalence of Internet addiction (IA) in adolescents so as to provide a scientific basis for the communities, schools, and families. We conducted a survey by randomized cluster sampling on 5,249 students, grades ranging from 7 to 12, in Anhui province, People's Republic of China. The questionnaire consisted of general information and IA test. Chi-square test was used to compare the status of IA disorder (IAD). In our results, the overall detection rate of IAD and non-IAD in students was 8.7% (459/5,249) and 76.2% (4,000/5,249), respectively. The detection rate of IAD in males (12.3%) was higher than females (4.9%). The detection rate of IAD was statistically different between students from rural (8.2%) and urban (9.3%) areas, among students from different grades, between students from only-child families (9.5%) and non-only-child families (8.1%), and among students from different family types. Prevalence of IA is high among Chinese adolescents. IAD has more effect on male students, single-child families, single-parent families, and higher grade students. We should take more care of male students, only-child students, and students living with their fathers, and related education should be strengthen for susceptible subjects of IDA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,718
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,208
of 381,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#70
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.