| Title |
A Cost–Benefit Analysis of Bipolar TURP for the Treatment of Bladder Outflow Obstruction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research and Reports in Urology, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rru.s277480 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giacomo Maria Pirola, Martina Maggi, Daniele Castellani, Alessandro Sciarra, Emanuele Rubilotta, Marilena Gubbiotti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 1 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
| Design | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#136
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,430
of 442,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.