Title |
Nomograms for Predicting Recurrent Herniation in PETD with Preoperative Radiological Factors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s312224 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chong Zhao, Hao Zhang, Yan Wang, Derong Xu, Shuo Han, Shengwei Meng, Jialuo Han, Houchen Liu, Chuanli Zhou, Xuexiao Ma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 22% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Researcher | 1 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 33% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,427
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318,569
of 442,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#62
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.