↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

PERSIST: Physician's Evaluation of Restasis® Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
PERSIST: Physician's Evaluation of Restasis® Satisfaction in Second Trial of topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% for dry eye: a retrospective review
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, November 2012
DOI 10.2147/opth.s30261
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francis Mah, Milner, Yiu, Eric Donnenfeld, Taryn Conway, David Hollander

Abstract

Chronic dry eye disease often requires long-term therapy. Tear film alterations in the setting of dry eye may include reduced tear volume as well as an increase in inflammatory cytokines and osmolarity. Topical cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis(®); Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) is indicated to increase tear production in patients with dry eye and reduced tear production presumed to be due to ocular inflammation. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a second trial of topical cyclosporine in patients with dry eye who were previously considered treatment failures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Other 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,492,480
of 11,341,533 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#492
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,129
of 308,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,341,533 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,468 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.