| Title |
The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Interventional Management of Cancer-Associated Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s315585 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mansoor M Aman, Ammar Mahmoud, Timothy Deer, Dawood Sayed, Jonathan M Hagedorn, Shane E Brogan, Vinita Singh, Amitabh Gulati, Natalie Strand, Jacqueline Weisbein, Johnathan H Goree, Fangfang Xing, Ali Valimahomed, Daniel J Pak, Antonios El Helou, Priyanka Ghosh, Krishna Shah, Vishal Patel, Alexander Escobar, Keith Schmidt, Jay Shah, Vishal Varshney, William Rosenberg, Sanjeet Narang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 51% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Maldives | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 22% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 63 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 63 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#592,197
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#74
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,662
of 454,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.