↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pelvic inflammatory disease: improving awareness, prevention, and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Pelvic inflammatory disease: improving awareness, prevention, and treatment
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, August 2016
DOI 10.2147/idr.s91260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Breanne B Das, Jocelyn Ronda, Maria Trent

Abstract

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a common disorder of the reproductive tract that is frequently misdiagnosed and inadequately treated. PID and its complications, such as infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain, are preventable by screening asymptomatic patients for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and promptly treating individuals with STIs and PID. The rates of adverse outcomes in women with PID are high and disproportionately affect young minority women. There are key opportunities for prevention including improving provider adherence with national screening guidelines for STIs and PID treatment recommendations and patient medication adherence. Nearly half of all eligible women are not screened for STIs according to national quality standards, which may increase the risk of both acute and subclinical PID. Moreover, in clinical practice, providers poorly adhere to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations for treatment of PID. Additionally, patients with PID struggle to adhere to the current management strategies in the outpatient setting. Novel evidence-based clinical and public health interventions to further reduce the rates of PID and to improve outcomes for affected women are warranted. We propose potential cost-effective approaches that could be employed in real-world settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 211 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 19%
Student > Postgraduate 21 10%
Student > Master 21 10%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 73 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 73 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,241,383
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#271
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,008
of 366,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.