↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Reducing infection risk in implant-based breast-reconstruction surgery: challenges and solutions

Overview of attention for article published in Breast cancer targets and therapy, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 326)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Reducing infection risk in implant-based breast-reconstruction surgery: challenges and solutions
Published in
Breast cancer targets and therapy, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/bctt.s97764
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adrian SH Ooi, David H Song

Abstract

Implant-based procedures are the most commonly performed method for postmastectomy breast reconstruction. While donor-site morbidity is low, these procedures are associated with a higher risk of reconstructive loss. Many of these are related to infection of the implant, which can lead to prolonged antibiotic treatment, undesired additional surgical procedures, and unsatisfactory results. This review combines a summary of the recent literature regarding implant-related breast-reconstruction infections and combines this with a practical approach to the patient and surgery aimed at reducing this risk. Prevention of infection begins with appropriate reconstructive choice based on an assessment and optimization of risk factors. These include patient and disease characteristics, such as smoking, obesity, large breast size, and immediate reconstructive procedures, as well as adjuvant therapy, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. For implant-based breast reconstruction, preoperative planning and organization is key to reducing infection. A logical and consistent intraoperative and postoperative surgical protocol, including appropriate antibiotic choice, mastectomy-pocket creation, implant handling, and considered acellular dermal matrix use contribute toward the reduction of breast-implant infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Other 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 24 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 45%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,370,823
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#10
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,584
of 348,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast cancer targets and therapy
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.