| Title |
Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy Combined with Static Magnetic Field in Severe COVID-19 Patients Requiring Intubation: A Pragmatic Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jir.s318758 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thiago De Marchi, Fabiano Frâncio, João Vitor Ferlito, Renata Weigert, Cristiane de Oliveira, Ana Paula Merlo, Délcio Luis Pandini, Bolivar Antônio Pasqual-Júnior, Daniela Giovanella, Shaiane Silva Tomazoni, Ernesto Cesar Leal-Junior |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Finland | 1 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Argentina | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2021.
All research outputs
#5,721,242
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#125
of 828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,545
of 442,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#12
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.