↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique: Is It the Best Option for Macular Holes?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique: Is It the Best Option for Macular Holes?
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2021
DOI 10.2147/opth.s284614
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nisa Silva, André Ferreira, Zofia Anna Nawrocka, Angelina Meireles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Unspecified 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 9 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,804
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,514
of 440,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#64
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.