↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Recent advances in noninvasive glucose monitoring

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 313)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
15 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
Title
Recent advances in noninvasive glucose monitoring
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, June 2012
DOI 10.2147/mder.s28134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chi-Fuk So, Kup-Sze Choi, Thomas KS Wong, Joanne WY Chung

Abstract

The race for the next generation of painless and reliable glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus is on. As technology advances, both diagnostic techniques and equipment improve. This review describes the main technologies currently being explored for noninvasive glucose monitoring. The principle of each technology is mentioned; its advantages and limitations are then discussed. The general description and the corresponding results for each device are illustrated, as well as the current status of the device and the manufacturer; internet references for the devices are listed where appropriate. Ten technologies and eleven potential devices are included in this review. Near infrared spectroscopy has become a promising technology, among others, for blood glucose monitoring. Although some reviews have been published already, the rapid development of technologies and information makes constant updating mandatory. While advances have been made, the reliability and the calibration of noninvasive instruments could still be improved, and more studies carried out under different physiological conditions of metabolism, bodily fluid circulation, and blood components are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Unknown 209 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 20 9%
Other 13 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 61 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 58 27%
Computer Science 12 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Physics and Astronomy 9 4%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 77 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,515,553
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#49
of 313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,413
of 182,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Devices : Evidence and Research
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,295 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them