Title |
Words that make pills easier to swallow: a communication typology to address practical and perceptual barriers to medication intake behavior
|
---|---|
Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s36195 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annemiek J Linn, Julia CM van Weert, Barbara C Schouten, Edith G Smit, Ad A van Bodegraven, Liset van Dijk |
Abstract |
The barriers to patients' successful medication intake behavior could be reduced through tailored communication about these barriers. The aim of this study is therefore (1) to develop a new communication typology to address these barriers to successful medication intake behavior, and (2) to examine the relationship between the use of the typology and the reduction of the barriers to successful medication intake behavior. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 38% |
Netherlands | 2 | 15% |
Japan | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Other | 18 | 23% |
Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 19% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 4 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2013.
All research outputs
#4,256,229
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#263
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,094
of 285,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.