Title |
Overall Reporting Descriptions of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain in Randomized Controlled Trials in English Journals
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s319195 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Na Zhang, Jian-Feng Tu, Ying Lin, Jin-Ling Li, Xuan Zou, Yu Wang, Hewen Li, Xiao-Ya Wei, Li-Qiong Wang, Guang-Xia Shi, Shi-Yan Yan, Cun-Zhi Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philippines | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2021.
All research outputs
#18,809,260
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,427
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,791
of 433,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#59
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.