| Title |
Perspectives in the selection of hyaluronic acid fillers for facial wrinkles and aging skin
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s3183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah E John, Richard D Price |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#108,465
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#8
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210
of 122,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them