| Title |
Locomotive syndrome: clinical perspectives
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s148683 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tatsunori Ikemoto, Young-Chang Arai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,538,940
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#818
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,133
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#28
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.