Title |
A Real-World Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of Biologicals and Bronchial Thermoplasty for Severe Refractory Asthma (BIOTERM)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Asthma and Allergy, August 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/jaa.s324099 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesco Menzella, Matteo Fontana, Carla Galeone, Maria D’Amato, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Giulia Ghidoni, Silvia Capobelli, Chiara Scelfo, Anna Simonazzi, Chiara Catellani, Patrizia Ruggiero, Nicola Facciolongo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 60% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 7% |
Engineering | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,779,862
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#65
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,514
of 433,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Asthma and Allergy
#6
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.