↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Interventions performed by community pharmacists in one Canadian province: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Interventions performed by community pharmacists in one Canadian province: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s37581
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie W Young, Lisa D Bishop, Amy Conway

Abstract

Interventions made by pharmacists to resolve issues when filling a prescription ensure the quality, safety, and efficacy of medication therapy for patients. The purpose of this study was to provide a current estimate of the number and types of interventions performed by community pharmacists during processing of prescriptions. This baseline data will provide insight into the factors influencing current practice and areas where pharmacists can redefine and expand their role.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 27%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 11 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 27%
Psychology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,070
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,310
of 285,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.