| Title |
Common Ophthalmic Preservatives in Soft Contact Lens Care Products: Benefits, Complications, and a Comparison to Non-Preserved Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Optometry, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opto.s235679 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chelsea S Bradley, Lindsay A Sicks, Andrew D Pucker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,117,944
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Optometry
#16
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,069
of 426,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Optometry
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them