↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Patients’ Preferences Regarding Invasive Mediastinal Nodal Staging of Resectable Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Patients’ Preferences Regarding Invasive Mediastinal Nodal Staging of Resectable Lung Cancer
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, September 2021
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s319790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jelle E Bousema, Fieke Hoeijmakers, Marcel G W Dijkgraaf, Jouke T Annema, Frank J C van den Broek, M Elske van den Akker-van Marle

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,065
of 1,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,174
of 433,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.