↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The roles of beta-adrenergic receptors in tumorigenesis and the possible use of beta-adrenergic blockers for cancer treatment: possible genetic and cell-signaling mechanisms

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The roles of beta-adrenergic receptors in tumorigenesis and the possible use of beta-adrenergic blockers for cancer treatment: possible genetic and cell-signaling mechanisms
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s39153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khanh vinh quốc Lu’o’ng, Lan Thi Hoàng Nguyễn

Abstract

Cancer is the leading cause of death in the USA, and the incidence of cancer increases dramatically with age. Beta-adrenergic blockers appear to have a beneficial clinical effect in cancer patients. In this paper, we review the evidence of an association between β-adrenergic blockade and cancer. Genetic studies have provided the opportunity to determine which proteins link β-adrenergic blockade to cancer pathology. In particular, this link involves the major histocompatibility complex class II molecules, the renin-angiotensin system, transcription factor nuclear factor-kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, and the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase. Beta-adrenergic blockers also exert anticancer effects through non-genomic factors, including matrix metalloproteinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, prostaglandins, cyclooxygenase-2, oxidative stress, and nitric oxide synthase. In conclusion, β-adrenergic blockade may play a beneficial role in cancer treatment. Additional investigations that examine β-adrenergic blockers as cancer therapeutics are required to further elucidate this role.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Professor 5 8%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,110,957
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,017
of 2,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,972
of 286,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,067 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.