↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews on Blended Learning: Trends, Gaps and Future Directions
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, October 2021
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s331741
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Azeem Ashraf, Meijia Yang, Yufeng Zhang, Mouna Denden, Ahmed Tlili, Jiayi Liu, Ronghuai Huang, Daniel Burgos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 297 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Student > Master 24 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Student > Bachelor 10 3%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 147 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 6%
Arts and Humanities 13 4%
Computer Science 12 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Other 53 18%
Unknown 159 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,757,966
of 25,923,151 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#245
of 795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,410
of 440,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,923,151 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.