↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Social determinants in ocular diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Optometry, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 103)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Social determinants in ocular diseases
Published in
Clinical Optometry, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/opto.s15290
Authors

Roghayeh Heidary, Reza Gharebaghi, Roghayeh Heidary, A H Gharebaghi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 67%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Optometry
#29
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,929
of 182,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Optometry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them