| Title |
A Systematic Review of Current Teleophthalmology Services in New Zealand Compared to the Four Comparable Countries of the United Kingdom, Australia, United States of America (USA) and Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s294428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Walsh, Sheng Chiong Hong, Renoh Johnson Chalakkal, Kelechi C Ogbuehi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 49 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,804
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,127
of 436,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#24
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.