↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Arginine deprivation therapy for malignant melanoma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 179)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Arginine deprivation therapy for malignant melanoma
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, December 2012
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s37350
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jung-Ki Yoon, Arthur E Frankel, Lynn G Feun, Suhendan Ekmekcioglu, Kevin B Kim

Abstract

Despite recent development of promising immunotherapeutic and targeted drugs, prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma remains poor, and a cure for this disease remains elusive in most patients. The success of melanoma therapy depends on a better understanding of the biology of melanoma and development of drugs that effectively target the relevant genes or proteins essential for tumor cell survival. Melanoma cells frequently lack argininosuccinate synthetase, an essential enzyme for arginine synthesis, and as a result they become dependent on the availability of exogenous arginine. Accordingly, a therapeutic approach involving depletion of available arginine has been shown to be effective in preclinical studies. Early clinical studies have demonstrated sufficient antitumor activity to give rise to cautious optimism. In this article, the rationale for arginine deprivation therapy is discussed. Additionally, various strategies for depleting arginine are discussed and the preclinical and clinical investigations of arginine deprivation therapy in melanoma are reviewed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 16 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,888,682
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#49
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,922
of 286,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them