↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgery, in intermediate and high-risk severe aortic stenosis patients

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
A Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgery, in intermediate and high-risk severe aortic stenosis patients
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, July 2019
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s208107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Eric Tarride, Trinh Luong, Gordon Goodall, Natasha Burke, Gordon Blackhouse

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 10%
Engineering 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,727,727
of 25,984,008 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#334
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,382
of 366,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,984,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.