↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Recalibrating SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Lateral Flow Test Relative Sensitivity from Validation Studies to Absolute Sensitivity for Indicating Individuals Shedding Transmissible Virus

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 809)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
49 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
368 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Recalibrating SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Lateral Flow Test Relative Sensitivity from Validation Studies to Absolute Sensitivity for Indicating Individuals Shedding Transmissible Virus
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, October 2021
DOI 10.2147/clep.s311977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene Petersen, Alexander Crozier, Iain Buchan, Michael J Mina, Jonathan W Bartlett

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 368 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 11 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 651. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#35,026
of 26,268,316 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,127
of 441,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,268,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.