The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 364 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Recalibrating SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Lateral Flow Test Relative Sensitivity from Validation Studies to Absolute Sensitivity for Indicating Individuals Shedding Transmissible Virus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s311977 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Petersen, Alexander Crozier, Iain Buchan, Michael J Mina, Jonathan W Bartlett |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 57 | 16% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 81% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 300 | 82% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 9% |
| Scientists | 27 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 648. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2023.
All research outputs
#35,534
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#3
of 810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,132
of 442,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.