↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

In vivo Simulation-Based Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students: Teaching and Assessment [Response to Letter]

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Medical Education and Practice, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
In vivo Simulation-Based Learning for Undergraduate Medical Students: Teaching and Assessment [Response to Letter]
Published in
Advances in Medical Education and Practice, October 2021
DOI 10.2147/amep.s342865
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michail Sideris, John Gerrard Hanrahan, Marios Nicolaides, Jade Jagiello, Kathrine S Rallis, Elif Emin, Efthymia Theodorou, Rebecca Mallick, Funlayo Odejinmi, Nikolaos Lymperopoulos, Apostolos Papalois, George Tsoulfas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#20,963,058
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,054
of 438,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them