| Title |
Effects of person-centered care on residents and staff in aged-care facilities: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s38589 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonya Brownie, Susan Nancarrow |
| Abstract |
Several residential aged-care facilities have replaced the institutional model of care to one that accepts person-centered care as the guiding standard of practice. This culture change is impacting the provision of aged-care services around the world. This systematic review evaluates the evidence for an impact of person-centered interventions on aged-care residents and nursing staff. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 461 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 451 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 41 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 95 | 21% |
| Unknown | 121 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 93 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 62 | 13% |
| Psychology | 33 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 56 | 12% |
| Unknown | 135 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,815,678
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#418
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,346
of 295,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.