↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Fetal and maternal complications in macrosomic pregnancies

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Reports in Neonatology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Fetal and maternal complications in macrosomic pregnancies
Published in
Research and Reports in Neonatology, March 2014
DOI 10.2147/rrn.s39110
Authors

Terence Lao, Yvonne Kwun-Yue Cheng

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Lecturer 8 11%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 27 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 31 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,932,863
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Neonatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,400
of 237,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Neonatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them