| Title |
Factors determining patients' intentions to use point-of-care testing medical devices for self-monitoring: the case of international normalized ratio self-testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s38328 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah, Julie Barnett, Jasna Kuljis, Kate Hone, Richard Kaczmarski |
| Abstract |
To identify factors that determine patients' intentions to use point-of-care medical devices, ie, portable coagulometer devices for self-testing of the international normalized ratio (INR) required for ongoing monitoring of blood-coagulation intensity among patients on long-term oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists, eg, warfarin. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 23% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2013.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,656
of 1,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,180
of 288,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#21
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.