| Title |
Biodegradable magnesium nanoparticle-enhanced laser hyperthermia therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s34902 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qian Wang, Liping Xie, Zhizhu He, Derui Di, Jing Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 24% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,215
of 179,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#31
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.