↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of Different Scoring Systems for Prediction of Mortality and ICU Admission in Elderly CAP Population
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, October 2021
DOI 10.2147/cia.s335315
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chunxin Lv, Yue Chen, Wen Shi, Teng Pan, Jinhai Deng, Jiayi Xu

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Unspecified 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,081,359
of 22,422,612 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,138
of 1,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,888
of 352,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,422,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.