↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s31179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Thomas Uncini

Abstract

Two primary categories of nutritional deficiency exist. An absolute nutritional deficiency occurs when nutrient intake is not sufficient to meet the normal needs of the system, and a relative nutritional deficiency exists when nutrient intake and systemic levels of nutrients are normal, while a change occurs in the system that induces a nutrient intake requirement that cannot be supplied from diet alone. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate that the primary component of chronic centrally acting monoamine (serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine) disease is a relative nutritional deficiency induced by postsynaptic neuron damage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 30 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 30%
Other 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Chemistry 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,324,443
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#109
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,250
of 163,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.