| Title |
Enhancing cognitive functioning in the elderly: multicomponent vs resistance training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s36514 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberta Forte, Colin AG Boreham, Joao Costa Leite, Giuseppe De Vito, Lorraine Brennan, Eileen R Gibney, Caterina Pesce |
| Abstract |
The primary purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two different exercise training programs on executive cognitive functions and functional mobility in older adults. A secondary purpose was to explore the potential mediators of training effects on executive function and functional mobility with particular reference to physical fitness gains. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 29% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 413 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 8% |
| Researcher | 29 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 17% |
| Unknown | 107 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 102 | 24% |
| Psychology | 43 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 12% |
| Unknown | 127 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,301,979
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#699
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,340
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.