↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Polyphenols as dietary supplements: A double-edged sword

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
Title
Polyphenols as dietary supplements: A double-edged sword
Published in
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, December 2009
DOI 10.2147/nds.s6422
Authors

Keith R. Martin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Other 38 20%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 31%
Chemistry 30 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 32 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,861,532
of 21,173,213 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#20
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,228
of 457,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,173,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them