| Title |
Polyphenols as dietary supplements: A double-edged sword
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition and Dietary Supplements, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/nds.s6422 |
| Authors |
Keith Martin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 16% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 28% |
| Chemistry | 31 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#22
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,136
of 167,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition and Dietary Supplements
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.