The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
High DSCC1 Level Predicts Poor Prognosis of Lung Adenocarcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of General Medicine, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijgm.s329482 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sisi Chang, Yahui Zhu, Yutan Xi, Fuyan Gao, Juanjuan Lu, Liang Dong, Chunzheng Ma, Honglin Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,117,872
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#152
of 1,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,887
of 425,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#7
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.