| Title |
Vernal keratoconjunctivitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s129552 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hampton Addis, Bennie H Jeng |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 39% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 46 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,416,577
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#261
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,662
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.