↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanodiamonds as novel nanomaterials for biomedical applications: drug delivery and imaging systems

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
Title
Nanodiamonds as novel nanomaterials for biomedical applications: drug delivery and imaging systems
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s37348
Pubmed ID
Authors

Randeep Kaur, Ildiko Badea

Abstract

Detonation nanodiamonds (NDs) are emerging as delivery vehicles for small chemical drugs and macromolecular biotechnology products due to their primary particle size of 4 to 5 nm, stable inert core, reactive surface, and ability to form hydrogels. Nanoprobe technology capitalizes on the intrinsic fluorescence, high refractive index, and unique Raman signal of the NDs, rendering them attractive for in vitro and in vivo imaging applications. This review provides a brief introduction of the various types of NDs and describes the development of procedures that have led to stable single-digit-sized ND dispersions, a crucial feature for drug delivery systems and nanoprobes. Various approaches used for functionalizing the surface of NDs are highlighted, along with a discussion of their biocompatibility status. The utilization of NDs to provide sustained release and improve the dispersion of hydrophobic molecules, of which chemotherapeutic drugs are the most investigated, is described. The prospects of improving the intracellular delivery of nucleic acids by using NDs as a platform are exemplified. The photoluminescent and optical scattering properties of NDs, together with their applications in cellular labeling, are also reviewed. Considering the progress that has been made in understanding the properties of NDs, they can be envisioned as highly efficient drug delivery and imaging biomaterials for use in animals and humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 23%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 12%
Student > Master 23 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 60 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 46 18%
Physics and Astronomy 35 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 10%
Materials Science 18 7%
Engineering 16 6%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 69 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,469
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,607
of 288,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#44
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.