| Title |
Acupuncture versus Lornoxicam in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic: A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s339006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaohua Zhang, Xinguo Liu, Qiongxiang Ye, Xunbao Wang, Jinjun Chen, Zhiyong Wang, Pengfei Zhao, Baozhou Tao, Guoping Xu, Wanfeng Xu, Kan Wu, Yao Xiao, Li Yang, Junqiang Tian, Juan Wang, Zhilong Dong, Zhiping Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 30% |
| France | 2 | 20% |
| Philippines | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Researcher | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,977,231
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#571
of 1,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,565
of 432,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#18
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.