| Title |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of ordered mesoporous silica as a novel adsorbent in liquisolid formulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s26763 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bao Chen, Zhouhua Wang, Guilan Quan, Xinsheng Peng, Xin Pan, Rongchang Wang, Yuehong Xu, Ge Li, Chuanbin Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 18% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 16% |
| Engineering | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#524
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,377
of 250,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.