| Title |
Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceg.s43084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrea Anderloni, Manol Jovani, Cesare Hassan, Alessandro Repici |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 46% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,270,252
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#80
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,699
of 235,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.