↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Sensory integration dysfunction affects efficacy of speech therapy on children with functional articulation disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Sensory integration dysfunction affects efficacy of speech therapy on children with functional articulation disorders
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2013
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s40499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-Chen Tung, Chin-Kai Lin, Ching-Lin Hsieh, Ching-Chi Chen, Chin-Tsan Huang, Chun-Hou Wang

Abstract

Articulation disorders in young children are due to defects occurring at a certain stage in sensory and motor development. Some children with functional articulation disorders may also have sensory integration dysfunction (SID). We hypothesized that speech therapy would be less efficacious in children with SID than in those without SID. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of speech therapy in two groups of children with functional articulation disorders: those without and those with SID.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 1%
India 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Other 4 5%
Lecturer 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 19%
Social Sciences 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 8%
Psychology 6 8%
Linguistics 5 6%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,000,263
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#866
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,596
of 289,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#10
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.