↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical Utility of Subcutaneous Factor VIII Replacement Therapies in Hemophilia A: A Review of the Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Clinical Utility of Subcutaneous Factor VIII Replacement Therapies in Hemophilia A: A Review of the Evidence
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, December 2021
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s260923
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yesim Dargaud, Maissa Janbain

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 13%
Librarian 1 13%
Unknown 6 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#20,137,012
of 22,641,687 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#239
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405,131
of 496,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,641,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.