↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
Title
Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, September 2016
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s113727
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Tuntland, Mona Kristin Aaslund, Eva Langeland, Birgitte Espehaug, Ingvild Kjeken

Abstract

The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is an occupational therapy instrument designed to help participants identify, prioritize, and evaluate performance of important occupations. To investigate the validity, responsiveness, interpretability, and feasibility of the COPM when used by various health professions in home-dwelling older adults receiving reablement. Reablement is a new form of multidisciplinary home-based rehabilitation for older adults experiencing functional decline. The sample of 225 participants, mean age 80.8 years, who were in need of rehabilitation for various health conditions were included in the study. Data collection was conducted at baseline and at 10 weeks follow-up. The COSMIN guidelines and recommendations for evaluating methodological quality were followed. Content validity, construct validity, and feasibility were found to be adequate. Responsiveness, however, was moderate. Functional mobility was the most frequently prioritized occupational category of all. Regarding interpretability, the minimal important change was 3.0 points and 3.2 points for performance and satisfaction, respectively. The older adults reported that COPM was a useful and manageable instrument. The majority of the occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and nurses reported that they had the required expertise to conduct the COPM assessments. The results support the multidisciplinary use of the COPM in clinical practice and research in a home-dwelling, heterogeneous population of older adults. Based on the findings, 3 points are recommended as a cutoff point to distinguish between older adults who have a minimal important change in COPM performance and COPM satisfaction and those who have not.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 124 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 5%
Other 5 4%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 49 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 41 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,952,678
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#58
of 854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,956
of 339,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.